Universal Coaching Centre -

Enter your keyword

8053+ OFFICERS SERVING THE NATION UNIVERSAL COACHING CENTRE Let's join hands together in bringing Your Name in Elite officers list. JOIN US 25 YEARS OF EXCELLENCE MEET NEW FRIENDS AND STUDY WITH EXPERTS JOIN US Nothing is better than having friends study together. Each student can learn from others through by teamwork building and playing interesting games. Following instruction of experts, you and friends will gain best scores.

ULP Click here! Click here! Classroom Programme NRA-CET Test Series
Click here ! Org code: XSHWV

post

US Supreme Court Limits Presidential Powers on Tariffs

Why in the News ?

The U.S. Supreme Court struck down tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), ruling that tariff powers lie with Congress. The judgment clarifies limits on presidential trade authority and strengthens legislative oversight, reinforcing principles of equal justice and access to justice in constitutional governance.

Supreme Court Ruling on Trump’s Tariffs:

  • The U.S. Supreme Court, in a 6–3 decision, ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not grant the President authority to impose tariffs.

  • The tariffs introduced by Donald Trump in 2025 were declared unconstitutional, as they lacked clear congressional approval.

  • Trump had justified the tariffs after declaring national emergencies linked to drug trafficking and trade imbalances.

  • These measures included 25% tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico, 10% tariffs on Chinese goods, and additional reciprocal tariffs on several countries.

  • The Court emphasised that tariffs fall under Congress’s constitutional authority to levy taxes and regulate foreign trade, upholding equal justice under the law.

Implications of the Verdict for Trade Policy

  • The ruling restricts the use of emergency powers to impose tariffs, clarifying the legal boundary between executive and legislative authority and preventing discriminatory laws.

  • However, the President may still impose tariffs under existing trade laws, provided statutory authority from Congress exists.

  • Potential legal routes include Section 122 and Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, and Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962.

  • Businesses affected by the tariffs have filed lawsuits seeking refunds, although the ruling does not automatically provide a compensation mechanism, highlighting ongoing challenges in access to justice for affected parties.

  • The tariffs had generated nearly $180 billion in revenue, increasing the economic stakes of the court decision.

About Tariffs and Trade Powers in the U.S. :

●  Tariffs: Taxes imposed on imported goods, often used to protect domestic industries or address trade imbalances.

●  U.S. Constitution: Grants Congress the power to levy taxes and regulate international trade, including tariffs, ensuring equal rights in legislative processes.

●  IEEPA (1977): Allows the President to regulate financial transactions and economic sanctions during national emergencies, but does not explicitly authorise tariffs.

●  Trade Act of 1974 (Section 301): Enables the U.S. government to impose tariffs in response to unfair trade practices by other countries.

●  Trade Expansion Act of 1962 (Section 232): Allows tariffs on imports considered a threat to national security, providing legal protection for domestic industries.