Enter your keyword

8053+ OFFICERS SERVING THE NATION UNIVERSAL COACHING CENTRE Let's join hands together in bringing Your Name in Elite officers list. JOIN US 25 YEARS OF EXCELLENCE MEET NEW FRIENDS AND STUDY WITH EXPERTS JOIN US Nothing is better than having friends study together. Each student can learn from others through by teamwork building and playing interesting games. Following instruction of experts, you and friends will gain best scores.

ULP Click here! Click here! Classroom Programme NRA-CET Test Series
Click here ! Org code: XSHWV

post

Supreme Court Expands CSR to Include Environmental Duty

Why in the News?

The Supreme Court ruled that Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) inherently includes environmental clearance obligations, holding corporations constitutionally bound to safeguard ecosystems, while hearing petitions related to conservation of the critically endangered Great Indian Bustard.

Supreme Court on Corporate Environmental Responsibility:

  • The Supreme Court bench of Justices P.S. Narasimha and Atul S. Chandurkar held that corporations, as legal persons, have a fundamental duty to protect the environment and obtain necessary environmental clearances.
  • The Court interpreted CSR as extending beyond shareholder interests to include ecosystem protection and environmental impact assessment.
  • It ruled that companies cannot claim to be socially responsible while ignoring environmental degradation caused by their activities or failing to secure proper environmental clearances.
  • Allocation of CSR funds for environmental protection and clearance processes was held to be not charity, but a constitutional obligation.
  • The judgment arose from petitions highlighting threats to the Great Indian Bustard, a flagship species of India’s arid and semi-arid grasslands, emphasizing the need for environmental democracy in conservation efforts.

Great Indian Bustard Case and Polluter Pays Principle

  • The Court emphasised that protection of endangered species is a paramount obligation in environmental governance, aligning with the Forest Conservation Act.
  • It invoked the polluter pays principle and precautionary principle, mandating that corporations whose activities harm habitats must bear the cost of ecological restoration and conduct thorough environmental impact assessments.
  • Sectors such as mining, power generation and infrastructure were specifically cautioned due to their ecological footprint and urged to adhere to EIA notifications.
  • The Court stated that CSR funds must be channelled towards in-situ and ex-situ conservation to prevent species extinction and promote a pollution-free environment.
  • Non-renewable power companies operating near bustard habitats in Rajasthan and Gujarat were urged to act as “guests in a shared environment”, recognizing coexistence with wildlife and respecting coastal regulation zones.

About Environmental Duties under Indian Constitution:

Article 51A(g) of the Constitution imposes a fundamental duty on every citizen to protect and improve the natural environment, including wildlife.
● Judicial interpretation has expanded this duty to include corporations as legal persons, emphasizing their role in environmental democracy.
● The polluter pays principle and precautionary principle are core doctrines of Indian environmental jurisprudence.
Corporate Social Responsibility under the Companies Act, 2013, mandates certain firms to spend on socially beneficial activities, including environmental clearances.
● The Court upheld expert committee recommendations revising priority conservation areas for the Great Indian Bustard to 14,013 sq km in Rajasthan and 740 sq km in Gujarat, highlighting the importance of environmental impact assessments in these regions.