GS2

New Public Administration (NPA) emerged in the 1960s as a response to the perceived rigidity and
inefficiency of traditional bureaucratic models, focusing on equity, participation, and responsiveness.
In contrast, New Public Management (NPM), which gained prominence in the 1980s, emphasizes
market-oriented governance, efficiency, and privatization. Both paradigms have significantly
influenced contemporary governance models, especially in India’s administrative reforms.
NPA, conceptualized during the Minnowbrook Conference of 1968, sought to make public
administration more citizen-centric and socially responsive. Thinkers like Dwight Waldo and Frank
Marini advocated for a more egalitarian approach to governance. In India, this approach is visible in
initiatives like the Aspirational Districts Programme, where administration focuses on equitable
regional development. Additionally, Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) programs embody NPA principles
by ensuring that government benefits reach marginalized sections directly, reducing bureaucratic
leakages.
NPM, influenced by scholars like Peter Drucker and David Osborne, introduced private-sector
techniques into public administration. This includes performance-based governance, decentralization,
and contractual service delivery. India’s Smart Cities Mission, privatization of Air India, and
outsourcing of services like Aadhaar enrollment to private agencies are manifestations of NPM. The
Public-Private Partnership (PPP) model, extensively used in infrastructure projects like Bengaluru
Metro, reflects the efficiency-driven approach of NPM.
While NPA ensures social justice and participatory governance, NPM enhances efficiency and cost
effectiveness. However, excessive reliance on privatization can undermine welfare objectives, as
seen in concerns over healthcare privatization leading to affordability issues. At the same time, rigid
bureaucratic structures without efficiency measures can result in delays and corruption.
India’s governance framework increasingly adopts a hybrid approach, integrating both NPA and NPM
principles. The success of schemes like Ayushman Bharat (which combines public welfare with
private healthcare partnerships) and Digital India (which enhances transparency through e
Governance) showcases this balance. Future administrative reforms should continue to align equity
driven policies with efficiency measures to ensure governance remains both inclusive and effective.

Responsive Administration refers to a governance model that is quick to adapt to citizens’ needs,
transparent, accountable, and participatory. It ensures public trust in institutions by providing effective
service delivery, grievance redressal mechanisms, and citizen engagement in decision-making. In a
democratic and welfare state like India, a responsive administration is essential for ensuring inclusive
development, social justice, and policy effectiveness.
A responsive administration is characterized by efficiency, decentralization, and real-time policy
implementation. The introduction of e-Governance initiatives such as Digital India, UMANG App, and
MyGov platform has revolutionized public service delivery. The Karnataka Sakala Scheme, which
guarantees timely delivery of public services, is a classic example of administrative responsiveness.
Similarly, the Aadhaar-enabled Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) system has significantly reduced
leakages and ensured targeted welfare distribution.
The importance of responsive administration was evident during the COVID-19 pandemic, where
digital platforms like CoWIN and Aarogya Setu played a crucial role in vaccine distribution and
tracking infections. Schemes like PM Kisan Samman Nidhi ensured immediate financial relief to
farmers, demonstrating how responsive administration enhances public trust. Additionally, platforms
like CPGRAMS (Centralized Public Grievance Redress and Monitoring System) ensure citizens can
hold the administration accountable.
However, challenges such as bureaucratic red-tapism, digital divide, and lack of awareness among
marginalized sections hinder its effectiveness. To make governance truly responsive, capacity
building among bureaucrats, increased use of artificial intelligence for real-time monitoring, and
strengthening local governance institutions are essential. A blend of technology-driven solutions,
administrative efficiency, and citizen participation can make India’s governance more agile,
transparent, and accountable.

Public Administration and Private Administration serve distinct purposes in governance and business,
respectively. Public Administration is primarily concerned with the welfare of citizens, while Private
Administration focuses on profitability and efficiency. While both involve planning, organizing,
directing, and controlling, their nature, accountability, and decision-making processes vary
significantly.
Public Administration is driven by public welfare objectives, ensuring that governance is inclusive and
participatory. It is funded by taxpayers’ money and operates under constitutional and legal
frameworks. For instance, government bodies like the Ministry of Rural Development implement
schemes like MGNREGA, which guarantees employment to rural workers. Additionally, institutions
like SBI and LIC, though commercial, function under the principles of public administration with a
focus on social responsibility.
Private Administration, on the other hand, follows market-oriented principles where decision-making
is faster due to fewer bureaucratic constraints. Private organizations such as Reliance, Infosys, and
Tata Group focus on maximizing shareholder value. Their performance is measured by profits, unlike
public organizations that are assessed on social impact. The Public-Private Partnership (PPP) model
in Bengaluru Metro and Smart Cities Mission demonstrates how public and private administration can
complement each other.
While public administration ensures equity and stability, it often faces challenges like bureaucratic
inefficiency and slow decision-making. Private administration, though efficient, may prioritize profit
over public welfare, as seen in rising healthcare costs in privatized hospitals. A balanced approach,
integrating efficiency of private administration with the inclusiveness of public administration, is
essential for effective governance in India.

Organizational Behavior (OB) is the study of how individuals and groups interact within an
organization. In public administration, it plays a crucial role in decision-making, leadership,
efficiency, and policy implementation. Effective governance depends on understanding human
behavior, motivation, and team dynamics, ensuring that bureaucratic processes remain efficient
and people-centric.
Public administration is people-driven, making OB crucial in areas like employee motivation,
ethical governance, and interdepartmental coordination. The Hawthorne Studies by Elton
Mayo highlight the importance of workplace environment and human relations in enhancing
productivity. Indian bureaucratic efficiency has improved through behavioral interventions like
Mission Karmayogi, which focuses on capacity building and behavioral training for civil servants.
One of the key applications of OB in public administration is in leadership and motivation. The civil
service system, traditionally hierarchical, often struggles with bureaucratic inertia and lack of
innovation. The introduction of transformational leadership and participatory decision-making
(as seen in schemes like Smart Cities Mission) helps improve performance.
However, challenges such as organizational resistance to change, hierarchical rigidity, and lack
of performance-based incentives hinder administrative efficiency. The bureaucratic structure in
India is often criticized for being rule-bound rather than outcome-oriented, making OB
principles essential for reform.
To strengthen governance, it is necessary to integrate OB concepts like participative
management, emotional intelligence, and team collaboration into administrative functioning.
India’s future governance must focus on people-centric administration, behavioral insights in
policymaking, and a dynamic work culture, ensuring that bureaucrats adapt to changing societal
needs effectively.

An effective organizational structure, well-defined systems, and streamlined processes are
essential for governance. The structure defines hierarchy, roles, and accountability, while systems
and processes ensure that policies are implemented efficiently and transparently. The Indian
administrative system, rooted in Weberian bureaucracy, has strengths but also faces challenges in
decision-making, coordination, and implementation.
A well-defined organization structure ensures clear authority, coordination, and accountability.
The hierarchical structure of Indian administration, with institutions like NITI Aayog, Ministries,
and State Governments, provides clarity but often leads to slow decision-making and excessive
paperwork.
Organizational systems ensure smooth functioning, particularly in public service delivery. E
Governance, AI-based monitoring, and the use of dashboards like PRAGATI (Pro-Active
Governance and Timely Implementation) have improved efficiency. However, rigid systems
sometimes lead to bureaucratic delays and lack of adaptability.
Efficient processes are crucial for decision-making, public service delivery, and financial
management. For instance, GST implementation streamlined indirect taxation, but initial technical
and administrative challenges slowed its adoption. Similarly, One Nation One Ration Card
(ONORC) has improved welfare delivery by making PDS benefits portable.
To make governance more effective, simplification of procedures, adoption of digital
governance, and interdepartmental coordination are essential. Reducing bureaucratic
bottlenecks, increasing accountability, and embracing technological advancements can
transform India’s public administration into a responsive and citizen-friendly system.

Centralization and decentralization are two contrasting administrative approaches that define
power distribution within governance. Centralization refers to concentrating decision-making at
higher levels, ensuring uniformity and control, whereas decentralization involves delegating
authority to lower levels for greater responsiveness and local governance. Delegation of authority,
an essential administrative tool, allows subordinates to take decisions within prescribed limits.

Centralization is useful in crisis situations where strong coordination is required, such as during
COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns, where the central government issued uniform guidelines.
However, excessive centralization can lead to bureaucratic inefficiency and delays, as seen in
issues related to top-down implementation of welfare schemes.
Decentralization enhances grassroots democracy and participatory governance. India’s 73rd and
74th Constitutional Amendments strengthened Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs) and Urban
Local Bodies (ULBs), ensuring local development through community participation. The
success of Kerala’s decentralized healthcare model during the pandemic demonstrates the
importance of local governance.
Delegation of authority is crucial for bureaucratic efficiency. In India, district collectors, municipal
commissioners, and panchayat officials are given autonomy for local-level decision-making.
However, challenges such as political interference, inadequate financial devolution, and
capacity constraints often hinder effective delegation.
For better governance, a balanced approach is needed. While centralization ensures policy
consistency, decentralization fosters efficiency and inclusiveness. Strengthening local
institutions, empowering district administrations, and increasing financial autonomy are
crucial for responsive governance.

PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) and CPM (Critical Path Method) are essential
project management tools that help in planning, scheduling, and controlling complex projects. These
techniques are particularly useful in infrastructure development, where timely completion and
resource optimization are critical.
1. Significance of PERT and CPM:
o PERT focuses on time management and helps in identifying the minimum time required
to complete a project.
o CPM identifies the critical path, which is the sequence of tasks that determine the
project’s duration.
2. Application in Karnataka’s Infrastructure Projects:
o Bengaluru Metro Project: PERT was used to estimate the time required for each
phase of the project, while CPM helped in identifying critical tasks like land acquisition
and tunneling.
o Smart City Projects: In cities like Mysuru and Hubballi-Dharwad, CPM was used to
prioritize tasks such as road construction and utility upgrades.
3. Current Affairs Example:
o The Karnataka government’s “Nava Karnataka Nirmana” initiative, which aims to
develop infrastructure across the state, has utilized PERT and CPM to ensure timely
completion of projects like highways and urban development schemes.
Conclusion:
PERT and CPM are indispensable tools in project management, especially for large-scale
infrastructure projects. Their application in Karnataka’s development initiatives has ensured efficient
resource utilization and timely project delivery.

SWOT analysis is a strategic tool used to assess the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and
threats associated with a policy or project. In public policy, it helps in identifying areas for
improvement and potential challenges.
1. Application of SWOT Analysis in Public Policy:
o Strengths: Existing resources, institutional support, and successful past initiatives.
o Weaknesses: Lack of funding, bureaucratic delays, and implementation challenges.
o Opportunities: Technological advancements, partnerships, and global trends.
o Threats: Political instability, economic downturns, and environmental factors.
2. Case Study: Karnataka’s Agricultural Policies:
o The Karnataka government’s “Krishi Bhagya” scheme was analyzed using SWOT.
▪ Strengths: High agricultural potential and farmer participation.
▪ Weaknesses: Dependence on monsoon and lack of modern technology.
▪ Opportunities: Adoption of precision farming and export potential.
▪ Threats: Climate change and market fluctuations.
3. Current Affairs Example:
o The recent “Karnataka Agricultural Price Policy” was evaluated using SWOT to address
issues like farmer distress and crop diversification.
SWOT analysis provides a comprehensive framework for formulating and evaluating public policies.
Its application in Karnataka’s agricultural policies has helped in addressing challenges and leveraging
opportunities for sustainable development.

India has emerged as a key player in international relations, leveraging its strategic location,
economic growth, and democratic values to influence global affairs. Its neighborhood policy and
participation in global forums reflect its commitment to peace, development, and multilateralism.
India’s Neighborhood First Policy emphasizes building strong ties with neighboring countries
through initiatives like the South Asian Satellite and the Maitri Dam in Afghanistan. However,
challenges such as border disputes with China and Pakistan have strained regional relations.
In global forums like the United Nations, India has been a vocal advocate for multilateralism and UN
reforms. It has contributed significantly to UN peacekeeping missions, with over 200,000 troops
deployed in missions like MONUSCO (Congo) and UNIFIL (Lebanon). India’s call for expanding the
Security Council to include more developing countries reflects its commitment to equitable global
governance.
As a member of the G20, India has championed issues like climate change, digital transformation,
and inclusive growth. During the COVID-19 pandemic, India’s Vaccine Maitri initiative provided
vaccines to over 90 countries, showcasing its role as a global leader.
In the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), India has advocated for the interests of developing countries
and promoted South-South cooperation. However, the relevance of NAM has diminished in the post
Cold War era, necessitating a reorientation of its objectives.
In conclusion, India’s role in international relations is characterized by its commitment to peace,
development, and multilateralism. While it has made significant contributions, addressing regional
challenges and enhancing its global leadership will be crucial for its future role in international affairs.

The Plate Tectonics Theory, developed in the 1960s, explains the movement of Earth’s lithosphere, which is divided into seven major and several minor tectonic plates. This theory evolved from Alfred Wegener’s Continental Drift Theory (1912), which proposed that continents were once part of Pangaea and later drifted apart. In the 1960s, Harry Hess and Robert Dietz introduced the Seafloor Spreading Theory, supported by paleomagnetic studies. John Tuzo Wilson further refined the theory by explaining plate interactions through different boundary types.

Plates move over the semi-molten asthenosphere due to mantle convection currents, ridge push, and slab pull, leading to various geological activities.

Types of Plate Boundaries and Their Role in Geological Activities

1. Convergent Boundaries (Colliding Plates)
   • Occur when two plates collide, leading to intense geological activity such as:
     • Mountain Formation – When two continental plates collide, they push the crust upward, forming large mountain ranges (e.g., Himalayas – collision of the Indian Plate and Eurasian Plate).
     • Subduction Zones – When an oceanic plate collides with a continental plate, the denser oceanic plate sinks beneath the continental plate, melting into magma and leading to volcanic eruptions and earthquakes (e.g., Andes Mountains, Pacific Ring of Fire).
2. Divergent Boundaries (Separating Plates)
   • Occur when two plates move apart, allowing magma to rise and create new crust. This results in:
     • Mid-Ocean Ridges – Underwater volcanic activity forms new oceanic crust (e.g., Mid-Atlantic Ridge).
     • Rift Valleys – When continental plates pull apart, large valleys form with volcanic activity and earthquakes (e.g., East African Rift).
3. Transform Boundaries (Sliding Plates)
   • Occur when two plates slide past each other horizontally, causing friction and stress buildup. This leads to:
     • Earthquakes – The plates do not move smoothly, leading to sudden slips and violent shaking (e.g., San Andreas Fault, California). Unlike convergent and divergent boundaries, no mountains or volcanoes form at transform boundaries.
4. Hotspots (Plume Activity)
   • Hotspots occur where magma rises from deep within the mantle, forming volcanic islands or supervolcanoes. These areas are not always located at plate boundaries.
     • Hawaiian Islands – Formed as the Pacific Plate moved over a hot mantle plume.
     • Yellowstone Caldera – A supervolcano formed by a mantle hotspot beneath North America.

Ocean salinity refers to the concentration of dissolved salts in seawater, typically measured in parts per thousand (ppt). The average salinity of the ocean is about 35 ppt (3.5%), but it varies due to multiple factors such as evaporation, precipitation, river inflows, ice formation, and ocean currents. These variations influence marine ecosystems, ocean circulation, and climate patterns.

Causes of Ocean Salinity Variations 

1. Evaporation (Increases Salinity)

• High temperatures in tropical and subtropical regions cause increased evaporation, leaving behind higher salt concentrations (e.g., Red Sea, Persian Gulf).

2. Precipitation (Decreases Salinity)

• Heavy rainfall in equatorial and polar regions dilutes seawater, reducing salinity (e.g., Bay of Bengal).

3. River Inflows (Decreases Salinity)

• Large rivers like the Amazon, Ganges, and Congo discharge freshwater, lowering coastal salinity levels.

4. Ice Formation and Melting

• Sea ice formation increases salinity as salt is expelled from forming ice.
• Ice melting adds freshwater, reducing salinity in polar oceans (e.g., Arctic and Antarctic).

5. Ocean Currents and Mixing

• Warm currents increase evaporation, raising salinity.
• Cold currents reduce evaporation, maintaining lower salinity.
• The Thermohaline Circulation (Global Conveyor Belt) moves salty, dense water across oceans, balancing salinity levels.

Impact of Salinity Variations

1. Influence on Ocean Circulation

• High salinity increases water density, driving deep-water currents (e.g., North Atlantic Deep Water formation).
• Low salinity slows ocean circulation, potentially disrupting global climate patterns.

2. Effects on Marine Ecosystems

• Marine species have specific salinity tolerance; changes can stress or relocate populations.
• Coral reefs thrive in stable salinity; fluctuations due to river runoff or ice melt can cause coral bleaching.

3. Impact on Atmospheric Systems

• • High salinity enhances moisture absorption, affecting hurricane intensity (e.g., warmer, saltier Atlantic waters fueling hurricanes).
  • Salinity-driven ocean currents influence El Niño and La Niña, altering global rainfall and temperature patterns.